Would you like to schedule a demonstration of Conformia products at your location? find out how »
 |
Conformance Maturity Matrix (CMM): Measuring Conformance Performance Across Best Practices in the Biotech/Pharmaceutical Industries
Conformia developed the Conformance Maturity Matrix (CMM) to identify key factors instrumental to achieving best practice performance in "Conformance Management" - the ability to capture, store, and communicate information across the complete lifecycle of development in an manner that enables businesses to simultaneously improve scientific innovation, business performance, and compliance goals.
Based on extensive market research in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, the CMM allows companies to compare their current processes against best practice techniques identified to drive and create operational breakthrough performance across information management and integration.
The CMM's foundation revolves around three elements responsible for optimal development management:
- Business Performance - align business processes with information management capabilities to enable superior operational performance
- Scientific Innovation - ability to leverage data in a manner that fosters continuous improvement and a greater understanding of the scale-up processes being developed
- Compliance Management - enable and facilitate mechanisms that ensure data is not only captured but also, enforced as processes move between non-GMP and GMP operating modes
Using these as the core elements, the CMM break outs 37 associated attributes (sample attributes listed below) that pinpoint
gaps across the following categories:
 Governance Decision-Making Prioritization Business Initiatives |
 Visibility Storage Retrievability Accessibility Leverageability |
 Information Systems Business Processes Tech Transfers Change Management Planning & Execution Partner Management Quality Systems |
 Cycle Times Quality Time to Market Project Performance Enforce Business Processes |
| Attribute |
CMM Approach |
Key Signs For Improvement |
| Phase-Gate Reviews |
Understand
organization's ability to gather information needed to make key decisions
along the lifecycle of process development
Measure level of
defined and agreed upon entry/exit requirements at each stage of development |
Responsibilities and
expectations required for a decision have not been defined causing ad-hoc
processes to develop - limited control over what is taking place within the
facility
Process development
activities are dictated by timelines not by actual events causing processes
to move between stages of development prematurely |
| Retrievability /Accessibility
|
Gauge effectiveness
of organization's information management system's ability to provide data in
a manner that facilitates the assembly of campaign history summaries,
deviation reports, manufacturing procedures, etc. |
Inability to learn
from past successes as well as mistakes due to inability to find information
when needed
Data is constantly
recreated because original supporting data can not be located
Lack ability to
correlate batch record results with associated equipment, materials, etc. - can not understand or link why certain data was created or specific
decisions were made |
| Tech Transfer Process |
Understand degree of
definition and harmonization around transfer points as a process moves from
toxicology to conformance lots |
Poorly defined tech
transfer points leads to duplicate efforts at multiple phases of development
Lack communication
between the groups involved in the process; "push-back" when requesting
information for tech transfer process is commonplace
No understanding of
what is required to move a process from non-GMP to GMP facilities
Transfers are delayed
due to information not being available at the right time |
| Planning Approach |
Ability to compare
planned processes against the executed batch record results; proactively
understand how upstream decisions may
impact overall manufacturability, quality, and scalability |
While planning
activities are performed well, the results of each activity are hard to
monitor and assess impacting ability to improve processes
Ability to correlate
specific batch records "executed - actual results" with "planned - expected
results" proves challenging |
| Information Systems Infrastructure |
Gauge effectiveness
of organization's information management system's ability to provide data in
a manner that facilitates the assembly of campaign history summaries,
deviation reports, manufacturing procedures, etc. |
Multiple systems
across the organization that don't "talk with one another" making it
difficult to know where to go for specific pieces of information
Information systems
have not been aligned with business process initiatives creating challenges
associated with meeting specific organizational goals related to
productivity, efficiency, etc. |
The CMM assessment quickly identifies the specific strengths as well as areas for improvement across the different areas making up the conformance management in the development arena. More importantly, the results serve as a roadmap for best practices that pharmaceutical and biotechnology executives can use to achieve the efficiencies and overall performance needed to stay competitive in today's pharmaceutical industry.
Approach and Sample Output
Issues:
A multi-billion dollar, multi-site life science organization was faced with a number of delays associated with its process development and scale-up activities. Faced with increasing productivity-related demands, the process development group asked Conformia to apply its CMM technique across the business, science, and compliance processes supporting the organization to help it identify solutions for improving quality, capacity, and overall productivity.
Approach:
Coupled with information gained from primary interviews, Conformia distributed the CMM survey to over 50 individuals spanning various functional groups and levels at multiple sites involved in process development activities. The survey was also distributed to key members of the company's contract manufacturer involved with the early to late stage development activities.
Results:
After compiling the results of the survey, Conformia identified the key gaps responsible for the company's limited operational performance. Revolving around poor cross-functional communication, approach to data capture, and siloed information systems, the company was not able to establish an effective technology transfer process. Indeed, requirements needed to transfer a process from one stage to the next were established "on the fly" in an ad-hoc manner. This approach further deepened the silo mentality observed across different functional groups - making it increasingly difficult for the downstream functions to know what to expect from their upstream partners.
Using the CMM results as a guide, Conformia worked with executives to design a roadmap not only presented the solutions but also, how this "future state" could be achieved by taking advantage of the organization's current best practice qualities.
Scorecard Examples:
- Measure organization's capacity to create a living 'development thread' - one that allows users to understand the who, what, when, why, how, and where for each specific process step and decision taken
- Ability to gather relevant data for reports, campaign summaries, investigations, etc., in a timely manner
- Gauge effectiveness of current information systems and their ability to organize and "structure" data generated during the process development stage
- Ability to compare planned versus executed processes within the batch record; correlate batch record with associated planned process descriptions and associated material, equipment, etc. used
- Continuous improvement - tools that allow data from past experiments to be leveraged in a manner that fosters process understanding
- Understand organization's ability to communicate information at the cross-functionally as well as across the enterprise; ensure that information needed to make key decisions is available at the right time and place (i.e. technology transfer reviews, phase-gate reviews, portfolio decisions, etc.)
- Determine the value proposition available to the organization by improving Product Conformance Management
If you have any questions regarding Conformia's approach and how your organization might benefit from participating in a CMM study, please contact:
Anjali Kataria, Co-Founder & Chief Marketing Officer
by email: akataria@conformia.com
|